All public logs

Combined display of all available logs of The Ludwig Wittgenstein Project. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).

• 17:27, 27 November 2023 JEisenthal talk contribs created page Private talk:Task: "About Wittgenstein" page/Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung (Created page with "[Ongoing edit and comments, initiated by JE. 27 Nov 2023.] “Don’t worry, I know you’ll never understand it”, Wittgenstein once told Russell and Moore, talking about the ''Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus''. And indeed, since its appearance, the book has aroused continuous and strong interest because of its enigmatic appeal as much as it did because of its undisputed brilliance. The work for which Wittgenstein is best known, the ''Tractatus'' is the only philosoph...") Tag: Visual edit
• 02:48, 8 November 2023 JEisenthal talk contribs created page Private talk:Task: "About Wittgenstein" page/Bemerkungen über Frazers “The Golden Bough” (Created page with "'''''Edit/comments by Josh Eisenthal, 7 Nov 2023:''''' According to Rush Rhees, in 1929 '''[1930? That's what I see in Rhee's intro in my copy of ''Remarks on Frazer''. JE.]''' Wittgenstein’s disciple Maurice O’Connor Drury (1907-1976) procured and read to his mentor passages from the English anthropologist Sir James George Frazer’s (1854-1941) ''The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion'' (in the 12-volume edition of 1906-1915). In 1931, Wittgenstein wrote...") Tag: Visual edit
• 02:20, 8 November 2023 JEisenthal talk contribs created page Private talk:Task: "About Wittgenstein" page/Review of P. Coffey, “The Science of Logic” (Created page with "'''''Suggested edit by Josh Eisenthal (7 Nov 2023):''''' In 1913, as part of his academic duties as a bachelor student, Wittgenstein wrote a brief review of ''The Science of Logic'', written by the philosopher and mathematician Peter Coffey. Wittgenstein's review appeared in ''The Cambridge Review'' (vol. 34, no. 853, 6 Mar. 1913, p. 351). In an openly ironic tone, he argues against the antiquated views of the author and the inaccuracies of the logical notions he expre...") Tag: Visual edit