6,064
edits
Review of P. Coffey, “The Science of Logic”: Difference between revisions
Review of P. Coffey, “The Science of Logic” (view source)
Revision as of 09:06, 7 January 2022
, 2 years agono edit summary
m (Mlavazza moved page Review of P. Coffey, The Science of Logic to Review of P. Coffey, “The Science of Logic”) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<li>[48] He confounds classes and complexes. (Mankind is a class whose elements are men; but a library is not a class whose elements are books, because books become parts of a library only by standing in certain spatial relations to one another—while classes are independent of the relations between their members.)</li> | <li>[48] He confounds classes and complexes. (Mankind is a class whose elements are men; but a library is not a class whose elements are books, because books become parts of a library only by standing in certain spatial relations to one another—while classes are independent of the relations between their members.)</li> | ||
<li>[47] He confounds complexes and sums. (Two plus two is four, but four is not a complex of two and itself.)</li> | <li>[47] He confounds complexes and sums. (Two plus two is four, but four is not a complex of two and itself.)</li> | ||
</ol> | |||
</html> | </html> | ||