5,960
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
This is, for example, the policy of Wikimedia projects,<ref>For a rich overview of the policy adopted on Wikimedia Commons, the Wikimedia repository of images, scanned texts and other multimedia files, see the {{plainlinks|[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory Copyright rules by territory] page.}}</ref> which have earned a very respectable position among those who are trying to challenge the traditional closed culture system while abiding by its rules. | This is, for example, the policy of Wikimedia projects,<ref>For a rich overview of the policy adopted on Wikimedia Commons, the Wikimedia repository of images, scanned texts and other multimedia files, see the {{plainlinks|[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory Copyright rules by territory] page.}}</ref> which have earned a very respectable position among those who are trying to challenge the traditional closed culture system while abiding by its rules. | ||
The notion of “country of origin” is a traditional concept that is defined by the Berne Convention itself. Even though its application is not always obvious when a work is first published in a digital format, for it may then be considered to be simultaneously published throughout the world,<ref name="lawexplores">Brian Fitzgerald, Sampsung Xiaoxiang Shi, Cheryl Foong, and Kylie Pappalardo, “{{plainlink|[https://lawexplores.com/country-of-origin-and-internet-publication-applying-the-berne-convention-in-the-digital-age/ Country of Origin and Internet Publication: Applying the Berne Convention in the Digital Age]}}”, in Brian Fitzgerald and John Gilchrist (eds.), ''Copyright Perspectives'', Springer 2015.</ref> determining the country of origin of a work that was first published in print is rather straightforward | The notion of “country of origin” is a traditional concept that is defined by the Berne Convention itself. Even though its application is not always obvious when a work is first published in a digital format, for it may then be considered to be simultaneously published throughout the world,<ref name="lawexplores">Brian Fitzgerald, Sampsung Xiaoxiang Shi, Cheryl Foong, and Kylie Pappalardo, “{{plainlink|[https://lawexplores.com/country-of-origin-and-internet-publication-applying-the-berne-convention-in-the-digital-age/ Country of Origin and Internet Publication: Applying the Berne Convention in the Digital Age]}}”, in Brian Fitzgerald and John Gilchrist (eds.), ''Copyright Perspectives'', Springer 2015.</ref> determining the country of origin of a work that was first published in print is rather straightforward: | ||
<div style="margin-left: 2em; color: #333333;">Under the Convention, determining the country of origin of a published work is simply a matter of ascertaining where that work was first published or simultaneously published. The rules provide that for works first published in a country of the Union, the country of origin will be that country. For works published simultaneously in several countries of the Union which grant different terms of protection, the country of origin will be the country with the shortest term of protection […]<ref name="lawexplores"/></div> | <div style="margin-left: 2em; color: #333333;">Under the Convention, determining the country of origin of a published work is simply a matter of ascertaining where that work was first published or simultaneously published. The rules provide that for works first published in a country of the Union, the country of origin will be that country. For works published simultaneously in several countries of the Union which grant different terms of protection, the country of origin will be the country with the shortest term of protection […]<ref name="lawexplores"/></div> | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
* Creative Commons Attribution – ShareAlike (CC BY-SA): the work can be used for all purposes, but the author must be credited and derivative works, if any, must also be licenced under CC BY-SA; | * Creative Commons Attribution – ShareAlike (CC BY-SA): the work can be used for all purposes, but the author must be credited and derivative works, if any, must also be licenced under CC BY-SA; | ||
* Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial (CC BY-NC): the work can be used for non-commercial purposes; the author must be credited; | * Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial (CC BY-NC): the work can be used for non-commercial purposes; the author must be credited; | ||
* Attribution | * Attribution – NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA): the work can be used for non-commercial purposes; the author must be credited and derivative works, if any, must also be licenced under CC BY-NC-SA. | ||
* Attribution | * Attribution – NoDerivatives (CC BY-ND): the work can be used for all purposes, but it cannot be remixed; the author must be credited; | ||
* Attribution | * Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND): the work can be used for non-commercial purposes, but it cannot be remixed; the author must be credited. | ||
== The copyright status of Wittgenstein’s individual works == | == The copyright status of Wittgenstein’s individual works == | ||
In this section, we will apply the concepts described above in order to clarify the copyright status of Wittgenstein’s works. We will limit ourselves to those that have been published on the Ludwig Wittgenstein Project’s website or might be in the short-to-medium term, thereby excluding those texts where the editors may have to be counted as co-authors. | In this section, we will apply the concepts described above in order to clarify the copyright status of Wittgenstein’s works. We will limit ourselves to those that have been published on the Ludwig Wittgenstein Project’s website or might be in the short-to-medium term, thereby excluding those texts where the editors may have to be counted as co-authors. | ||
For each work, the copyright status in the country of origin and in Italy will be described and explained. Occasionally, the copyright status in the United States will be discussed, as the US, despite not playing | For each work, the copyright status in the country of origin and in Italy will be described and explained. What is written about Italy can be considered to be valid for all countries where, as a general rule, copyright exires 70 years or fewer P.M.A.; however, since local exceptions may exist, generalisation should be done, so to speak, at one’s own risk. Occasionally, the copyright status in the United States will be discussed, as the US, despite not playing any special role from the point of view of the Ludwig Wittgenstein Project, are certainly, to this day, the centre of gravity of the web. | ||
The information is valid and up to date in 2022. | The information is valid and up to date in July 2022. Copyrights that are still standing will gradually expire in the coming years and decades. | ||
=== Review of P. Coffey, “The Science of Logic” === | === Review of P. Coffey, “The Science of Logic” === | ||
The ''Review of P. Coffey, “The Science of Logic”'' was first published in the UK | The ''Review of P. Coffey, “The Science of Logic”'' was first published in the UK in the English journal ''The Cambridge Review'', vol. 34, no. 853, 6 Mar. 1913, p. 351. | ||
Its country of origin is the United Kingdom. This work is in the public domain there because the copyright term for literary works in the UK is 70 years P.M.A. | Its country of origin is the United Kingdom. This work is in the public domain there because the copyright term for literary works in the UK is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | ||
This work is in the public domain in Italy because the copyright term for literary works in Italy is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | This work is in the public domain in Italy because the copyright term for literary works in Italy is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | ||
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
The ''Tagebücher 1914-1916'' were first published in Germany in the volume ''Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Tagebücher 1914-1916. Philosophische Untersuchungen'', Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1960, pp. 85-278. | The ''Tagebücher 1914-1916'' were first published in Germany in the volume ''Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Tagebücher 1914-1916. Philosophische Untersuchungen'', Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1960, pp. 85-278. | ||
Their country of origin is Germany. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works | Their country of origin is Germany. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works in both countries is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | ||
=== Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung === | === Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung === | ||
The ''Logisch-philosophische Abhanlung'' was first published in Germany in the journal ''Annalen der Naturphilosophie'', no. 14, 1921, pp. 185-262. | The ''Logisch-philosophische Abhanlung'' was first published in Germany in the journal ''Annalen der Naturphilosophie'', no. 14, 1921, pp. 185-262. | ||
Its country of origin is Germany. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works in both countries is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | |||
Additionally, it is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in 1921 and everything that was published before 1 January 1927 is now in the public domain in the US. | Additionally, it is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in 1921 and everything that was published before 1 January 1927 is now in the public domain in the US. | ||
=== Wörterbuch für Volks- und Bürgerschulen === | === Wörterbuch für Volks- und Bürgerschulen === | ||
The ''Wörterbuch für Volks- und Bürgerschulen'' was first published in Austria as ''Wörterbuch für Volks- und Bürgerschulen'', Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, | The ''Wörterbuch für Volks- und Bürgerschulen'' was first published in Austria as ''Wörterbuch für Volks- und Bürgerschulen'', Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna 1926. | ||
Its country of origin is Austria. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works | Its country of origin is Austria. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works in both countries is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | ||
Additionally, it is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in 1926 and everything that was published before 1 January 1927 is now in the public domain in the US. | Additionally, it is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in 1926 and everything that was published before 1 January 1927 is now in the public domain in the US. | ||
The preface (''Geleitwort zum Wörterbuch für Volksschulen'') was first published in ''Wörterbuch für Volksschulen'', edited by A. Hübner, E. Leinfellner and W. Leinfellner, Schriften der Österreichischen Wittgensteingesellschaft, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna 1977, pp. {{Small caps|xxv}}–{{Small caps|xxxv}}. Its country of origin is Austria. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works in both countries is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | |||
=== Bemerkungen über Frazers “The Golden Bough” === | === Bemerkungen über Frazers “The Golden Bough” === | ||
Synthese 1967 | The ''Bemerkungen über Frazers “The Golden Bough”'' were first published in the Dutch journal ''Synthese'', vol. 17, no. 3, Sep. 1967, pp. 233–253. | ||
Their country of origin are the Netherlands. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works in both countries is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | |||
=== Philosophische Untersuchungen === | === Philosophische Untersuchungen === | ||
Blackwell, Oxford, | The ''Philosophische Untersuchungen'' were first published in the United Kingdom as ''Philosophische Untersuchungen'', edited by G.E.M. Anscombe and R. Rhees, Blackwell, Oxford 1953. | ||
Their country of origin is the United Kingdom. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works in both countries is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | |||
=== Zettel === | === Zettel === | ||
Blackwell, Oxford, | The ''Zettel'' were first published in the United Kingdom as ''Zettel'', edited by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright, Blackwell, Oxford 1967. | ||
Their country of origin is the United Kingdom. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works in both countries is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | |||
=== Bemerkungen über die Farben === | === Bemerkungen über die Farben === | ||
The ''Bemerkungen über die Farben'' were first published in the United Kingdom as ''Bemerkungen über die Farben'', edited by G.E.M. Anscombe, Blackwell, Oxford 1977. | |||
Their country of origin is the United Kingdom. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works in both countries is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | |||
Oxford | === Über Gewißheit === | ||
''Über Gewißheit'' was first published in the United Kingdom as ''Über Gewißheit'', edited by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright, Blackwell, Oxford 1977. | |||
Its country of origin is the United Kingdom. This work is in the public domain there, as well as in Italy, because the copyright term for literary works in both countries is 70 years P.M.A. and the author died before 1952. | |||
=== Notes on Logic === | === Notes on Logic === | ||
The ''Notes on Logic'' were first published in the United States of America, in the journal ''The Journal of Philosophy'', 54, 1957, pp. 230–245. | The ''Notes on Logic'' were first published in the United States of America, in the journal ''The Journal of Philosophy'', 54, 1957, pp. 230–245. | ||
Its country of origin is the US.<ref name="simultaneous">According to the Berne Convention, “for works published simultaneously in several countries of the Union which grant different terms of protection, the country of origin will be the country with the shortest term of protection”. The definition of “simultaneous publication” is publication in multiple countries within 30 days. We haven’t been able to prove that in the 1950s the ''Journal of Philosophy'' consistently reached its European subscribers within 30 days of the publication in the US, but we haven’t been able to conclusively rule it out either. If it were possible to prove that this was the case, then the ''Notes on Logic'' would count as simultaneously published in the US and in Europe; therefore, per the Berne Convention, they would have European countries as their country of origin; therefore, per the copyright laws of European countries, they would now be in the public domain in their country of origin.</ref> In order to determine the copyright status of a work which has the US as its country of origin, knowledge of the date of the author’s death is not sufficient. Per the Hirtle Chart [link], the current copyright status of a work first published in the US between 1927 and 1964 depends on whether or not it was published with a copyright notice (which we should assume was the case) and, if it was, on whether or not copyright was renewed before its expiry, the term of which was then 28 years: if copyright was renewed, the text is still copyrighted in the | Its country of origin is the US.<ref name="simultaneous">According to the Berne Convention, “for works published simultaneously in several countries of the Union which grant different terms of protection, the country of origin will be the country with the shortest term of protection”. The definition of “simultaneous publication” is publication in multiple countries within 30 days. We haven’t been able to prove that in the 1950s the ''Journal of Philosophy'' consistently reached its European subscribers within 30 days of the publication in the US, but we haven’t been able to conclusively rule it out either. If it were possible to prove that this was the case, then the ''Notes on Logic'' would count as simultaneously published in the US and in Europe; therefore, per the Berne Convention, they would have European countries as their country of origin; therefore, per the copyright laws of European countries, they would now be in the public domain in their country of origin.</ref> In order to determine the copyright status of a work which has the US as its country of origin, knowledge of the date of the author’s death is not sufficient. Per the Hirtle Chart [link], the current copyright status of a work first published in the US between 1927 and 1964 depends on whether or not it was published with a copyright notice (which we should assume was the case) and, if it was, on whether or not copyright was renewed before its expiry, the term of which was then 28 years: if copyright was renewed, the text is still copyrighted in the US; if it wasn’t, the text is now in the public domain in the US. Although a relatively small percentage of the works from this period had their copyright renewed with the US copyright office, it should not be assumed that this issue of the ''Journal of Philosophy'' was not. In order to determine until what date the text will be copyrighted, it would be necessary to know the details of the renewal; in what would be a worst case scenario from the point of view of free culture, the date would be calculated as follows: the text was published in 1957 and copyright was renewed at the latest possible moment before expiry, i.e., in 1957 + 28 = 1985; the second term, in 1985, had a duration of 47 years, meaning that it will expire in 1985 + 47 = 2032 and the text will enter the public domain in the US on 1 January 2033. | ||
However, in February 2017 the text of Wittgenstein’s Ts-201a1 and Ts-201a2 were released by the copyright holders – The Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge; Bertrand Russell Archives at McMaster University Library, Hamilton, Ontario; University of Bergen, Bergen – under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence. Therefore, the text should be regarded as being in the public domain in countries where the copyright term is 70 years P.M.A. and licenced under CC BY-NC 4.0 International in the US. As was discussed above in this essay (see [[#Copyright in the age of the internet|§ Copyright in the age of the internet]]), a work being in the public domain in its country of origin is not a requirement for it to be freely reusable, remixable etc. elsewhere, but rather a generally accepted good practice when the work is to be published on the internet; because of the internet’s lack of national boundaries, that is, we consider it a good compromise to always make sure that we abide by the rules both of a work’s country of origin and of the country where the work is used, remixed, etc. The situation is similar when a work is not in the public domain in its country of origin but rather is licenced under the terms of a non-free Creative Commons licence such as CC BY-NC: we always want to abide by the rules both of a work’s country of origin and of the country where the work is used, remixed, etc. In this case, this means treating the work (Wittgenstein’s original text) as though it was also licenced under CC BY-NC in Italy. Now, CC BY-NC does not prohibit derivative works (for it does not include the “ND”, | However, in February 2017 the text of Wittgenstein’s Ts-201a1 and Ts-201a2 were released by the copyright holders – The Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge; Bertrand Russell Archives at McMaster University Library, Hamilton, Ontario; University of Bergen, Bergen – under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence. Therefore, the text should be regarded as being in the public domain in countries where the copyright term is 70 years P.M.A. and licenced under CC BY-NC 4.0 International in the US. As was discussed above in this essay (see [[#Copyright in the age of the internet|§ Copyright in the age of the internet]]), a work being in the public domain in its country of origin is not a requirement for it to be freely reusable, remixable etc. elsewhere, but rather a generally accepted good practice when the work is to be published on the internet; because of the internet’s lack of national boundaries, that is, we consider it a good compromise to always make sure that we abide by the rules both of a work’s country of origin and of the country where the work is used, remixed, etc. The situation is similar when a work is not in the public domain in its country of origin but rather is licenced under the terms of a non-free Creative Commons licence such as CC BY-NC: we always want to abide by the rules both of a work’s country of origin and of the country where the work is used, remixed, etc. In this case, this means treating the work (Wittgenstein’s original text) as though it was also licenced under CC BY-NC in Italy. Now, CC BY-NC does not prohibit derivative works (for it does not include the “ND”, “NoDerivatives” clause), nor does it require derivative works to be licenced under the same terms (for it does not include the “SA”, “ShareAlike” clause). Therefore, the LWP’s translations have been published under CC BY-SA. | ||
=== Notes Dictated to G.E. Moore in Norway === | === Notes Dictated to G.E. Moore in Norway === |